Two Days Prior to Event
5:00 p.m. – Receive Pitch Decks
You will receive business plans and a fund profile by email at 5pm in the host school’s time zone. Make sure you can receive large files by email. Some university email systems catch it as spam. You have less than two days to do a month’s worth of due diligence. It is imperative that your team has a strategy for handling this workload. During this time your team needs to:
- Thoroughly research ALL of the startups. Do not dismiss one because you do not plan to offer a term sheet. At the event, you’ll need to perform well in front of all the judges, who will be split into different rooms during due diligence sessions.
- Utilize your school’s resources and network. That’s how VCs would do it! VCIC is a great excuse to connect with entrepreneurial alumni and expand your professional network. There is no longer a rule preventing outside help. Take advantage of that freedom!
- Fully prepare for due diligence sessions, including a list of questions and a strategy for each entrepreneur. Practice your questions with your teammates. Figure out a system so that you are not stepping all over each other nor shotgunning through a pre-decided list. Judges will want to see you hearing the answers and pivoting on the fly, as you’ll need to do to get the information you need from the founders.
- Customize the deliverables template and begin filling in some of the blanks so that you can quickly make changes at the event rather than starting from scratch.
- Create ready-to-go spreadsheets and/or other materials so that your team is prepared to plug in numbers on the fly at the event. You will not have time to create spreadsheets from scratch (e.g., cap tables, exit scenarios, valuation analysis). You are not required to submit these materials, but you may need them to answer judges’ questions, and some teams submit them as appendices to the written deliverables. Be warned that complicated appendices may hurt more than they help, especially if there is ANY mistake in them. Judges are pressed for time, too.
Evening before Event
We recommend you arrive the evening before at the latest. Get settled. Get a good night’s sleep. Practice your questions with each other in the hotel room. The specific words you use, the tone you adopt, the flow your team achieves…all of these will make a difference in due diligence sessions tomorrow. Try to anticipate some of the answers and be ready with follow-up questions. Don’t ask anything that you should already know! You don’t have time for that.
Day of Event
Most MBA events are on Fridays. Most undergraduate events are on Saturdays.
8:00 a.m. – Team Check-In
You’ll have a chance to check out the facilities, find your study room, connect to the host school’s WiFi and generally get the lay of the land. Arrive on time and go to your study room to continue preparing for due diligence. Organizers will walk through the schedule and take questions. Coffee, bagels and pastries are usually served (check with host).
9:00 a.m. – Venture Pitches
Each startup has 10-12 minutes to pitch. No questions are allowed during the presentations. Slides are not distributed, other than whatever materials were emailed prior to the event. Take good notes and be prepared to ask specific questions during due diligence that follow up on assertions made by the founders.
10:00 a.m. – Due Diligence
After watching the presentations, each team will have 14-minutes with each entrepreneur followed by 3-minutes with the judges. This session is your chance to get any information you need directly from the entrepreneur to make your decision. It is also the first opportunity you have to show off in front of judges, who will only get to score your performance with one entrepreneur (they can only be in one place at a time). Hence, your team needs to be on its game for all Q&A sessions. Think of these deals as having been referred to you by a respected colleague or a limited partner. Even if you know you cannot fund the deal, you will have to explain your decision thoughtfully.
Make sure you get the information you need. Don’t just run through a list of questions. The judges want to see that you know what information you need and that you are skilled at getting it. If a founder evades a question, be sure to follow up, but be cognizant of the need to build rapport, especially if you intend to put a term sheet down for this deal. Generally it is better if all teammates participate in the Q&A, though you should come with a strategy that fits your team. For example, if you have a teammate or two who are not great verbal communicators, you might introduce them as analysts who will be taking notes, or figure out some other way to explain the value they are bringing.
Questions to consider for due diligence:
- Who asks the questions? Are we all equally skilled at asking questions?
- Is there someone who should not ask questions? Who decides which questions to ask? Who decides when we move on to the next question or when we probe further for the information we are seeking?
- How do we handle talkative or reticent entrepreneurs?
- How do we create “rapport” with entrepreneurs?
- What is our technique for getting good answers, not just asking questions?
- Do we have a tone we’d like to take? Are we friendly? Enthused? Poker-faced? Rushed? Are we united in tone? Good cop, bad cop?
- How do we balance showing the judges what we know or getting information out of the entrepreneur?
- Do we pretend that we care about the answers even if we already know we would not invest in this entrepreneur?
- Should we express our interest or apathy in the deal?
- Should we try and negotiate preliminary deal terms during the session?
- Should we use the same strategy with all entrepreneurs or try different techniques?
Due Diligence Judging Criteria
- How well did the team cover what you consider the key issues/questions?
- How did the team seem to understand the business opportunity and strategy?
- To what level was the team able to establish appropriate rapport with the entrepreneur?
- How appropriately did the team lead/control the meeting?
- How well did the team dig into the right issues?
- How skilled was the team at getting information (not just asking a list of questions)?
- To what level did the team appropriately demonstrate their unique value as an individual VC firm to the entrepreneur?
- How well did the team demonstrate an understanding of the financial requirements of this deal?
- How well did the group appear to work together as a team (as best you can tell)?
1:00 p.m. – Written Deliverables
You only have a couple of hours to make strategic investment decisions and finalize deliverables (and eat lunch). The executive summary covers all deals: why you will or will not invest. Make sure it explains your investment decision. Be sure to prioritize bullets to make your analysis clear. Be aware that judges are under extreme time pressure, too, and if you over complicate things, even if it is brilliant, it may distract. You have up to three pages of appendices to further make your point (with graphs, charts, comparables or whatever). Teams are highly encouraged to use the supplied Team Deliverables Template. If you are feeling lost with pre-money valuation and investment size, make sure to watch the training videos and take a look at the VC Razor return analysis worksheet.
Judges will receive your deliverables approximately five minutes before you enter the room for your Partner Meeting.
Written Deliverables Judging Criteria
- Reasons to invest
- Reasons not to invest
- Overall decision
- Aligned interests between VC and entrepreneur
- Valuation, investment size, syndicate, fund fit, option pool, other terms
1:30 p.m. – Partner Meetings
Each team sits down with the judging panel around a boardroom table. You have 10 minutes to explain your investment decision to the judges and demonstrate your VC abilities. Judges will have just received your written deliverables. This session simulates an investment committee partner meeting in which junior partners or associates bring in a deal. You have the floor for this 10 minute session, but you should expect to be interrupted.
The tone of these meetings is difficult to predict, as the individuals on the judging panel will be different from region to region and from year to year. However, you should expect a tough session, as this is typical of real VC partner meetings, where the goal is to uncover any potential problems with a deal, which can feel like an interrogation for the partner or associate who brought the deal to the table. In other words, partners are often very tough on one another, and that toughness translates into tough meetings for VCIC teams, too. Also be aware that it can be difficult for judges to differentiate between smart, well-prepared teams. One way to do so is to dig deep into some deal terms to see how deep your team’s knowledge goes. This can feel like an unfair focus on a technical nuance but is (arguably) a reasonable strategy to identify the most knowledgeable team. Sometimes, the harshness of the questions is an indication that they think your team is a contender and that they are trying hard to trip you up.
Keep in mind that different judges will have different perspectives, and that they don’t all agree on most anything. A tough question from one judge may be irrelevant to another.
Partner Meetings Judging Criteria
- Demonstrated VC knowledge
- Adequately explained deal
- Addressed key issues
- Confident and convincing
- All members contributed
3:00 p.m. – Negotiations
You have 10 minutes to further demonstrate your VC abilities to the judges. You won’t be judged on getting to a deal, but you will be penalized if you are not truly negotiating, see Judging Criteria. Your entrepreneur will have just received a copy of your term sheet summary. There are many strategies for negotiating. This is something your team should practice with local entrepreneurs before you come to a regional finals.
We recommend that you don’t just sit down and ask the founder what they think. Rather, start with some enthusiasm your team has for the investment. Build some rapport. Perhaps include some ways your firm would bring something to the table beyond the cash. Be careful not to appear to be dancing around key issues. See judging criteria: you are not trying to get to a deal, but you must confront key issues, even if they cannot be resolved. If you hit an impasse, pivot to something else.
Negotiations Judging Criteria
- Focused on the key issues
- Tackled tough issues
- Established positive rapport
- Demonstrated firm’s value
- Note: teams are not judged on “getting to a deal”
3:45 p.m. – VC Round Robin
After winners are announced, each team gets one-on-one time with each judge. Many students say that this is the best part of the day. We recommend you avoid the temptation to ask “why didn’t we win” and use the discussion as an opportunity to build your network. Ask the VC which deal they would have chosen, how they would have structured the deal, what risks they saw in the deal, etc. If you find a judge who voted your team #1, spend extra time connecting and make sure to get a business card.
5:00 p.m. – Offsite Networking Event — DO NOT SKIP THIS!!
Past participants strongly encourage you to take advantage of this networking session where you will connect with other students who share your interest in venture capital. This is a rare opportunity to expand your professional network with peers who are as interested as you are in getting into VC. For those of you who are highly motivated to pursue this career, the contacts you make at VCIC can be invaluable.
Morning after the Event
Recommended departure time for traveling teams.